The shortlist of the 2025 Republic of Consciousness Prize, announced this week, includes Invisible Dogs (CBe). The other books are: There’s A Monster Behind the Door by Gaëlle Bélem, translated by Karen Fleetwood and Laëtitia Saint-Loubert (Bullaun Press); How to Leave the World by Marouane Bakhti, translated by Lara Vergnaud (Divided Press); Célina by Catherine Axelrad, translated by Philip Terry (Les Fugitives); Mother Naked by Glen James Brown (Peninsular Press).
Congratulations to all and many thanks to the judges. Huge thanks to the judges, because they have a job I don’t think I could do. I could go to meet colleagues for brunch in a Turkish restaurant behind Paddington Station – which according to Neil Griffiths, the founder of the prize, writing on the RoC substack, is where they slimmed down the longlist of 10 to the shortlist of 5 – and I could happily choose for myself from the menu but choosing dishes that would please us all would be tricky. Some of us are vegan. Some of us eat meat but not eggs. Some of us (to quote from Neil’s substack) are not even keen on brunch: ‘too in-betweeny’.
The RoC Prize was founded to address a climate in which ‘publishers who could least afford to take the financial risk were left to publish the most risk-taking work’, and its focus has always been on small presses rather than individual books. Every announcement of the long- and shortlists foregrounds the presses over the books and more money goes to them than to the authors or translators. Each press – and the definition of ‘small press’ has required adjustment over the years the prize has been running – is allowed to submit just one book. So is the book being judged as representative of that press, rather than for its individual merit? I don’t think I want to know, just as I really am glad that I didn’t happen to be in that Turkish restaurant and overhear the discussion at the next table. All these prizes, to maintain their fascination, need to retain an air of mystery.
The money is important too. Right now, it looks likely that the money coming to CBe from the RoC long- and shortlistings will enable publication next year of a book I’m keen on and that would otherwise not appear. Two weeks ago I wrote about money on this blog - see the post immediately below this one.
All the RoC shortlisted titles will be celebrated at the Library at Deptford Lounge on 13 March: full details here.
As ever, the Season Tickets on the home page of the CBe website offer a good return: any 6 books from the 79 titles listed for £50, or any 10 books for £75. (There are also specific special offers which change every month or so – 2 books for £16, 3 for £24 – at the foot of the Books page.) Free postage. Beats Amazon. They can be bought for others as well as yourself. No need to wait for Christmas.
Sonofabook
www.cbeditions.com
Thursday, 27 February 2025
Sunday, 9 February 2025
Writing and money (and death and sex)
‘Literature is news that stays news,’ said Pound, but the activities of writing, reading and publishing are really not news at all: they are what goes on in the background, usually very quietly, and only get on to the news pages when they involve one or more of the staple ingredients of fiction, whether ‘literary’ fiction or genre: death, sex and money.
This post is about money. In December 2022 the Society of Authors reported on an ALCS (Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society) report under the headline ‘report on author incomes shows 60% drop in median incomes since 2006’. Here is a screenshot of the summary:
The full ALCS report is available from their website as an 86-page pdf download. It records ‘a sustained downward trend [in writers’ income] over the past two decades’. The report acknowledges the ‘lack of a stable definition of “an author”’ – a phrase I like – but was based on responses to survey questions from 60,000 writers. 51% male, 91% white, on the whole middle-aged (age group 55-64 comprising 25% of the total sample); 47% ‘primary occupation author’, 24% ‘all working time spent on writing’, and about half ‘work at least part-time in other employment’.
The Guardian also reported on the ALCS report. Its piece was a press release with quotes from salaried people in other organisations (Society of Authors, Writers’ Guild, Publishers Association) pasted in. No quotes from writers and no digging down. More recently the Guardian reported on another money issue, Baillie Gifford’s withdrawal of sponsorship funding from all literary festivals (the Hay and Edinburgh festivals had already cut free) after protests against BG’s investment in fossil fuel companies; there was much protest against the protestors; there was no mention (that I saw) of the fact that for 99% of writers the disappearance of all literary festivals would make no difference to their income.
(The Guardian’s news pages also cover literary prizes – invariably mentioning in the opening paragraph how much money the winner has bagged – and record auction prices for works of art; deaths of famous authors and artists; and scandals involving plagiarism, forgery and sexual abuse. Death, sex and money. Mostly money.)
Money shouts and literature whispers, so the conversation is always going to be difficult, but especially so in a country that has not just a capitalist economy, society, culture, but mindset. There are Premier League footballers earning £500,000 a week; there are closures and redundancies in the Humanities departments and Creative Writing courses at universities; in the private sector, there are people paying thousands for week-long writing courses on Greek islands with good food and wine. Meanwhile, the Arts Council is scatter-gun but necessary: as well as propping up the big guns (the Royal Opera House, the National Theatre, etc.), it gives cash to people without traditional privilege. It’s a Band-Aid plastered over deep political failure. The countries in Europe – two hours by Eurostar or Ryanair – that offer tax breaks to independent bookshops and restrictions on discounting by online retailers, or where the government buys copies of all new books and distributes them to libraries, seem very far away.
My tribe: writers, artists, gallerists, small-press publishers, booksellers. Not exclusively, far from it; some of the people I love have no interest in books at all. But if any of them is making more than the ALCS 2022 median income of £7,000 from their writing, painting, showing, publishing, they are rare exceptions. My point here is not to counter arguments that we are not ‘professional’ because we don’t make money (we are professional); and not to suggest that we don’t need paying because we are ‘incentivised’ by ‘love of creating’ (we also like a roof over our heads, and food); and not to claim that we are especially resilient or somehow ‘heroic’ (no). This is simply how it is, though you wouldn’t know it from how writing is reported in the news. And not from the ads for writing courses that promise to ‘take your writing to a new level’ or ‘progress your career’, with advice from ‘industry experts’.
Like most writers, like many small presses, CB editions makes a loss, every year; a sustainable loss, to date; a healthy loss, because it keeps me on my toes. CBe has never had Arts Council funding for any of its books but of course it is subsidised – by my state pension, by my bus pass, by my having picked up design and typesetting know-how in previous work so I don’t have to pay for these, by my freelance work for others, by my living in a country in which there are people who have ‘disposable income’. This isn’t news.
This post is about money. In December 2022 the Society of Authors reported on an ALCS (Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society) report under the headline ‘report on author incomes shows 60% drop in median incomes since 2006’. Here is a screenshot of the summary:
The full ALCS report is available from their website as an 86-page pdf download. It records ‘a sustained downward trend [in writers’ income] over the past two decades’. The report acknowledges the ‘lack of a stable definition of “an author”’ – a phrase I like – but was based on responses to survey questions from 60,000 writers. 51% male, 91% white, on the whole middle-aged (age group 55-64 comprising 25% of the total sample); 47% ‘primary occupation author’, 24% ‘all working time spent on writing’, and about half ‘work at least part-time in other employment’.
The Guardian also reported on the ALCS report. Its piece was a press release with quotes from salaried people in other organisations (Society of Authors, Writers’ Guild, Publishers Association) pasted in. No quotes from writers and no digging down. More recently the Guardian reported on another money issue, Baillie Gifford’s withdrawal of sponsorship funding from all literary festivals (the Hay and Edinburgh festivals had already cut free) after protests against BG’s investment in fossil fuel companies; there was much protest against the protestors; there was no mention (that I saw) of the fact that for 99% of writers the disappearance of all literary festivals would make no difference to their income.
(The Guardian’s news pages also cover literary prizes – invariably mentioning in the opening paragraph how much money the winner has bagged – and record auction prices for works of art; deaths of famous authors and artists; and scandals involving plagiarism, forgery and sexual abuse. Death, sex and money. Mostly money.)
Money shouts and literature whispers, so the conversation is always going to be difficult, but especially so in a country that has not just a capitalist economy, society, culture, but mindset. There are Premier League footballers earning £500,000 a week; there are closures and redundancies in the Humanities departments and Creative Writing courses at universities; in the private sector, there are people paying thousands for week-long writing courses on Greek islands with good food and wine. Meanwhile, the Arts Council is scatter-gun but necessary: as well as propping up the big guns (the Royal Opera House, the National Theatre, etc.), it gives cash to people without traditional privilege. It’s a Band-Aid plastered over deep political failure. The countries in Europe – two hours by Eurostar or Ryanair – that offer tax breaks to independent bookshops and restrictions on discounting by online retailers, or where the government buys copies of all new books and distributes them to libraries, seem very far away.
My tribe: writers, artists, gallerists, small-press publishers, booksellers. Not exclusively, far from it; some of the people I love have no interest in books at all. But if any of them is making more than the ALCS 2022 median income of £7,000 from their writing, painting, showing, publishing, they are rare exceptions. My point here is not to counter arguments that we are not ‘professional’ because we don’t make money (we are professional); and not to suggest that we don’t need paying because we are ‘incentivised’ by ‘love of creating’ (we also like a roof over our heads, and food); and not to claim that we are especially resilient or somehow ‘heroic’ (no). This is simply how it is, though you wouldn’t know it from how writing is reported in the news. And not from the ads for writing courses that promise to ‘take your writing to a new level’ or ‘progress your career’, with advice from ‘industry experts’.
Like most writers, like many small presses, CB editions makes a loss, every year; a sustainable loss, to date; a healthy loss, because it keeps me on my toes. CBe has never had Arts Council funding for any of its books but of course it is subsidised – by my state pension, by my bus pass, by my having picked up design and typesetting know-how in previous work so I don’t have to pay for these, by my freelance work for others, by my living in a country in which there are people who have ‘disposable income’. This isn’t news.
Friday, 17 January 2025
2025: 2016 and the Hyena
First newsletter of the year. The news is – happily, and thanks mainly to some very loyal readers – that there is no news, in the sense that some very good books are being written and CBe will be publishing a very small number of them during 2025.
Finished copies of the first two 2025 books are in and can be ordered from the website. First, Mrs Calder and the Hyena, short stories by Marjorie Ann Watts, which will be officially published on 28 January, the author’s 98th birthday. [Ed.: Surely some mistake? No – no typo there, no mistake.]
Second, 2016 by Sarah Hesketh. 2016 was quite a year: David Bowie died in January and Leicester City won the Premier League in May and Jo Cox was murdered in June and in November many good people still thought that Donald Trump could not possibly be elected President of the US … Fergal Keane: 2016 ‘vividly, stirringly defies categorisation. It is a story, a poem, an oral history, a series of arguments about an epoch, and who and what we are becoming.’
Later in the year, Patrick McGuinness’s Ghost Stations: Essays and Branchlines. And a novel, maybe. And maybe more interruptions (99 Interruptions is down to a few last copies but they don’t stop at 99).
On the 13 February you have a tricky choice: Sarah Hesketh will be reading from 2016 at Shakespeare and Company in Paris, and on the same evening Will Eaves will be reading from Invasion of the Polyhedrons and Beverley Bie Brahic from her Carcanet collection Apple Thieves at the Broadway Bookshop in London: more details here. Beverley Bie Brahic’s Hunting the Boar and her translations of Apollinaire (The Little Auto) and Francis Ponge (Unfinished Ode to Mud) are still in print with CBe; as are several previous titles by Will Eaves, including The Absent Therapist and Broken Consort.
As always, the new titles can be included in the Season Tickets: 6 books of your own choice for £50, or 10 for £75, free UK postage. Available from the home page of the website. I like going to the post office: below, post receipts from the past months, kept for tax purposes and to stuff my shoes when the leather wears out.
Thursday, 26 December 2024
Late in the day, my book of the year
Charles Reznikoff’s Testimony comprises around 450 poems that tend to begin with a name, a place (farm, factory, saloon, boarding house) and sometimes a time of day or the age of the named person if relevant, and that tend to end with violence – gunshots, knife wounds, mutilation in industrial accidents. Their language is court-room plain, these are the facts; courtly, I’d say, respectful; no Henry James sub-clauses; the power is accumulative. Testimony was published in the US in several volumes by New Directions and Black Sparrow Press between 1965 and 1978; it was reissued in 2015 by Black Sparrow in a single edition – subtitled The United States (1885–1915): Recitative – that also includes as an appendix the prototype volume, written in prose, first published in 1934.
I’ve known of this book without ever, until this year, getting to it. It is one of the books of the last century; it has never been published in the UK. Repeat: it has never been published in the UK.
Reznikoff (1894–1976), by all accounts, was a modest man. He was born in Brooklyn to Russian Jewish immigrant parents. He sold hats for the family business. He wore out a lot of shoe leather, walking 20 miles a day on the streets of New York. In his twenties he had poems accepted by the magazine Poetry and then withdrew them; most of his work until the 1960s was self-published, and typeset and printed by himself. His poetry is included in anthologies of the Objectivists alongside that of Louis Zukofsky, George Oppen and Carl Rakosi (all of them immigrants to the US or the sons of immigrants). He studied law and practised very briefly but then ducked down, Bartleby-ish, and for many years earned his living by writing summaries of court records for legal reference books.
‘I glanced through several hundred volumes of old cases – not a great many as law reports go – and found almost all that follows.’ This is Reznikoff’s brief prefatory note to his 1934 prose version of Testimony. Given that what comes to court is the bad stuff – murders, rape, theft, claims for negligence, property disputes and forged wills – Testimony is not a picnic in the park. It could be shelved in the True Crime section, a descendant of The Newgate Calendar, the 18th-century compilation of stories detailing the crimes and punishments of notorious criminals – except that Reznikoff cuts off before the jury declares and the judge’s sentence, and doesn’t do moralising and titillation. As a documentary record of poverty and harsh conditions of labour, it could be shelved in the region of James Agee’s Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, first published in 1941 with photographs by Walker Evans – except that Agee’s own anger and bitter frustration are built into his text, while Reznikoff absents himself.
Some opening lines, at random: ‘She was a widow in her fifties / and lived in two rooms with her son’; ‘Price lived on a creek and Porter on the same creek about a mile above’; ‘A man, tall and husky, came from a city to a neighbouring town / on a Saturday / and went to a lodging-house for blacks’; ‘A young woman, a Syrian who had been in the United States only about six months / and as yet could not speak English / was travelling by railroad from town to town / peddling lace’; ‘He was a plumber who did not earn much – / a widower with three small children’; ‘John had slept with the wife of the man at whose home he boarded / for over a year and told her that if she were a widow / he would marry her’; ‘When Susan was about eleven, she worked in a cotton mill: / at first sweeping the floor, and afterwards “doffing” bobbins’. You can sense from such beginnings that things aren’t going to turn out well, and usually they don’t, but there is occasional small relief. Here is a complete poem that describes a crime scene without recording the crime: ‘The murderer walked through the woods towards his victim / along logging paths no longer used: / rubbers on his feet to keep the mud from his shoes / and holding an umbrella in case it rained.’ There is sly humour: the thief who gets tangled up in the sacks he is wearing to conceal his identity; the thief who is shot and turns out to be a fox. Here is another complete short poem: ‘When they told her husband / that she had lovers / all he said was: / one of them might have a cigar / and set the barn on fire.’
I think Reznikoff was concerned with justice – not legal justice, which is hit-or-miss (most crimes don’t even come to court), but the justice that is involved in giving voice to unheard lives. This is a delicate matter: serve the material, stay out of the way, no special pleading. Acts of witness to the casual, pervasive, day-to-day violence of men on men, and men on women, and sometimes women on men, and machines on children, the poems take no side and deliver no verdicts. An out-of-work labourer is slashed with a knife by three others, robbed, and thrown into a river, but manages to struggle to the bank: ‘Here he was seen by men on a passing steamboat / and picked up / to live a little longer – and tell what had happened.’
There will be, surely, there must be, if there’s any point to writing at all, written records of Palestine suffering genocide by the Israeli state, and Sudan and Yemen and the very local violence of power on my doorstep, and literature hasn’t made a damn bit of difference.
Tuesday, 24 December 2024
Joy
On Christmas Day last year the Guardian published Carol Rumens’ selection from the sequence of very short poems that Paul Bailey had been writing, and that he continued to write until he died in October this year. The last one arrived in late September and begins: ‘He hears his mother telling him / he’ll be late for his funeral.’
Last week I read Bailey’s early novel Trespasses (1970), which is devastatingly good (and out of print). After at least a dozen novels, and biographies and memoirs besides, Paul’s final two books were collections of poems, both published by CBe. He lived down the road and was generous with wine and books and gossip and links to hilariously rude cartoons and film clips about Trump and Johnson and the other idiots and this isn’t the same road it used to be.
Medically, Paul didn’t have a good time over the past few years but Joie de vivre, the title of his last book, is not ironic. Even the Trumps should have joy in their lives because the reason they spend so much effort denying joy to others is that they haven’t got any themselves.
Last week I read Bailey’s early novel Trespasses (1970), which is devastatingly good (and out of print). After at least a dozen novels, and biographies and memoirs besides, Paul’s final two books were collections of poems, both published by CBe. He lived down the road and was generous with wine and books and gossip and links to hilariously rude cartoons and film clips about Trump and Johnson and the other idiots and this isn’t the same road it used to be.
Medically, Paul didn’t have a good time over the past few years but Joie de vivre, the title of his last book, is not ironic. Even the Trumps should have joy in their lives because the reason they spend so much effort denying joy to others is that they haven’t got any themselves.
Sunday, 17 November 2024
Newsletter November 2024
Paul Bailey, who published his first novel in 1967 and was twice Booker-shortlisted, has died. Guardian obituary here. He lived local: generous, funny, incisive company. And book-swapping. And gossip. His last two books were collections of poems: Inheritance and Joie de vivre, both published by CBe (above). I’m clean out of stock but more copies will arrive next week and can be ordered now and I know that sounds cheap and Paul, frankly, is laughing.
Lara Pawson’s Spent Light did not win the Goldsmiths Prize on 6 November but we had fun on the shortlist and congratulations to Rachel Cusk and there are two mentions in the TLS Books of the Year for Spent Light – which ‘has burnt through the months’ (Paul Griffiths) and ‘which is very dark and has great love for the world and its inhabitants’ (Sarah Moss). Special mention to Kirkdale Books in Sydenham, which has sold more copies of Spent Light than any other novel this year – individual booksellers enthusing about specific books still works, who knew?
Spent Light has a recent review – ‘so brilliant it touches the sublime’ – in the Telegraph, and so does Invisible Dogs: ‘Boyle has created something dread-making, with real elegance.’ This is new territory: I cannot recall any other CBe title being reviewed there.
Will Eaves will be reading from Invasion of the Polyhedrons and Charles Boyle from Invisible Dogs at Bookseller Crow, SE19 3AF, on 28 November - more details here.
Above, Cate Blanchett outside Lutyens and Rubinstein bookshop in Notting Hill in the Apple TV series Disclaimer, looking a bit lost (with reason: the script is not good). She goes in to ask if the books she has ordered have arrived and is told: ‘I think we’re still waiting for the Agota Kristof.’ I’m not sure which Kristof she wanted but Cate, if you are reading, the day after watching I took in both Trilogy and The Illiterate and they are there for you to collect.
CBe is still on X, for now, but as of yesterday is also on Bluesky, here. To any new readers, welcome. This newsletter and previous are archived here on the CBe blog, Sonofabook, which has been running since 2007 and also has occasional rants. And there’s this, on the website (Season Tickets): 6 CBe books entirely of your own choice for £50 (or 10 for £75), post free in the UK.
Wednesday, 30 October 2024
Disclaimer: Waiting for Kristof
‘You stop at your local bookshop. You want to kill some time in a place where you’re admired.’ This is voice-over in episode 4 of Disclaimer, an Apple TV series starring Cate Blanchett and Kevin Kline which is bad in very many ways – the writing and acting for starters – but let’s focus in here because it’s hilarious. The Cate Blanchett character goes into the Lutyens and Rubinstein bookshop in Notting Hill and asks if the books she has ordered have come in and is told: ‘I think we’re still waiting for the Agota Kristof.’
Many months ago I was emailed by a film production company who wanted to have the CBe edition of Kristof’s The Notebook on the set of a series starring Blanchett and Kline. Yes, go for it, and it was nice of them to ask. There must have been a lot of emails because every inch of every shelf is meticulously curated: jars, plants, fruit bowls, pots and pans. The sex is curated too. Not the cooking – the Guardian review of episode 1 ends: ‘What kind of idiot starts frying sole meunière when it’s already obvious her husband is going to be late?’
I think we are meant to be impressed by the Cate Blanchett character in Disclaimer wanting to buy a book by Agota Kristof; I think it’s intended to signal sophisticated intelligence. (Kafka would have been too obvious; if she’s asking for Kristof, she has already read Kafka.) This is lazy and silly. My bookshelves are not evidence of my intelligence; nor is there any simple correlation between the making of good art and the betterment of society. By the end of next week the new president of the US will be either a women-hating racist or Harris, who needs the votes of everyone who wants to avoid Trump but is in hoc to a colonialist lobby that’s OK with genocide in Gaza.
The US election is next Tuesday, 5 November. Which happens to be publication date of Invisible Dogs, by me, with a nice review in the Telegraph already up, and on Wednesday a lot of good-hearted people will gather to learn which book on the shortlist for the Goldsmiths Prize, Lara Pawson’s Spent Light from CBe being one of them, gets the cash and the pats on the back. It will be a strange week.
In case Cate Blanchett is still waiting for her Kristof, I took Trilogy, The Illiterate and The Notebook into Lutyens and Rubinstein today. (The man I gave them to said yes, there had been filming in the shop for Disclosure but he hadn’t watched it himself and Agota who?) The single edition of The Notebook is out of print – it’s now included in Trilogy – but that’s the one the film company asked for (and there’s a tiny number of copies still around). The two others are available from the website; if you go to the Special Offers on the Books page, you can save yourself £7 by buying both for £16.
Many months ago I was emailed by a film production company who wanted to have the CBe edition of Kristof’s The Notebook on the set of a series starring Blanchett and Kline. Yes, go for it, and it was nice of them to ask. There must have been a lot of emails because every inch of every shelf is meticulously curated: jars, plants, fruit bowls, pots and pans. The sex is curated too. Not the cooking – the Guardian review of episode 1 ends: ‘What kind of idiot starts frying sole meunière when it’s already obvious her husband is going to be late?’
I think we are meant to be impressed by the Cate Blanchett character in Disclaimer wanting to buy a book by Agota Kristof; I think it’s intended to signal sophisticated intelligence. (Kafka would have been too obvious; if she’s asking for Kristof, she has already read Kafka.) This is lazy and silly. My bookshelves are not evidence of my intelligence; nor is there any simple correlation between the making of good art and the betterment of society. By the end of next week the new president of the US will be either a women-hating racist or Harris, who needs the votes of everyone who wants to avoid Trump but is in hoc to a colonialist lobby that’s OK with genocide in Gaza.
The US election is next Tuesday, 5 November. Which happens to be publication date of Invisible Dogs, by me, with a nice review in the Telegraph already up, and on Wednesday a lot of good-hearted people will gather to learn which book on the shortlist for the Goldsmiths Prize, Lara Pawson’s Spent Light from CBe being one of them, gets the cash and the pats on the back. It will be a strange week.
In case Cate Blanchett is still waiting for her Kristof, I took Trilogy, The Illiterate and The Notebook into Lutyens and Rubinstein today. (The man I gave them to said yes, there had been filming in the shop for Disclosure but he hadn’t watched it himself and Agota who?) The single edition of The Notebook is out of print – it’s now included in Trilogy – but that’s the one the film company asked for (and there’s a tiny number of copies still around). The two others are available from the website; if you go to the Special Offers on the Books page, you can save yourself £7 by buying both for £16.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)